MM TAX CLUB_whatsapp

MM TAX CLUB

Accounting & Tax Consultancy Firm

Blogs

CBIC issued revised guidelines and formats for arrest reports and Incident Reports (where arrests not made)

Instruction No. 02/2024-Customs dated February 15, 2024

The undersigned is directed to draw your attention to Board's Instruction No. 19/2018-Customs dated November 22, 2018 from F.No. 394/107/2018 Commr (Inv.-Cus.) which prescribed formats for informing arrest (Annexure I) or other incident (Annexure II). Subsequent instruction dated October 05, 2021 had reminded for timely reporting, while communication dated August 03, 2022 had directed sharing of reports with the DG, ARM.

A review of databases and email communications received thus far indicates that Annexure II incidents are not being shared by numerous Zones. The sharing by certain Zones is sporadic. The reported Annexure-I or II, many times contain description/detail that is insufficient as input for enhanced risk profiling. It is noted that the collection and integration of a proper database is very much required for the purpose of prevention of smuggling through early detection of entities involved and by understanding their adjusting modus operandi. The expeditious up-dating of database is imperative for achieving the optimum risk based targeting across Zones (i.e. nationally). This agility nullifies tactics that syndicates adopt across Zones or modes of carriage or routes.

Keeping the above in view, revised Annexure-1 (intimation of arrest) and revised Annexure- II (incident report where arrest is not made) formats are enclosed. A guide on how to fill the format is being provided to bring uniformity in nature of data. The reporting is to be made only by email and simultaneously to the addresses which are shown on these formats.

The intimation of arrest (revised Annexure-I) shall continue to be sent by the Chief Commissioner/Director General through email within 24 hours of the arrest of an individual.

The Board notes that incidents are cases (under the Customs Act 1962 that are related to outright smuggling and commercial frauds) with which every jurisdictional Commissioner is expected to be up to date. The incident report where arrest is not made (revised Annexure-II) has, from the beginning, sought to capture description/details that are usually routinely collected and reported to senior officers within a Commissionerate in near real-time basis.

For example, if there is a batch or shift or roster based schedule of working, incidents are being brought to notice within the Commissionerate in line with such schedule. In other instances, the incidents are being brought to notice of senior officers normally on the same or next day. Therefore, for timely reporting, the Board prescribes that whenever such incidents arise, the Commissioner/ADG shall immediately email the Annexure-II to the Board and other addressees. Each Commissioner must ensure that his/her internal proformae for bringing to notice such incidents are aligned to suit the reporting to be made to the Board. The Chief Commissioners are requested to ensure strict compliance of this instruction in their respective Zone.

Access Instruction

MCA notified the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2024

Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) Notified [F. No. 01/16/2013 CL-V (Pt-I)] dated 14th February, 2024.

In exercise of the powers conferred by sections 396,398,399, 403 and 404 read with sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014, namely:—

1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2024.

(2) They shall come into force with effect from 16th day of February, 2024.

2. In the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014, after rule 10, the following rule shall be inserted, namely:-

“10A. Central Processing Center.- (1) The Registrar of the Central Processing Center established under sub-section (1) of section 396 shall examine or cause to be examined every application or e-Form or document required or authorised to be filed or delivered as provided under sub-rule (3), for approval, registration or taking on record by the Registrar.

(2) The Registrar shall take a decision on the application, e-forms or documents within thirty days from the date of its filing excluding the cases in which an approval of the Central Government or the Regional Director or any other competent authority is required.

(3) The provisions of sub-rule (2) to (5) of rule 10 shall apply mutatis mutandis in relation to the examination of application, e-Forms or documents under this rule.

(4) The Registrar of the Central Processing Center shall exercise jurisdiction all over India in respect of the examination of following application, e-Forms or documents, namely:-

Sl. No.

Details of application, e-Form or documents

(i)

Filing of Resolutions and agreements to the Registrar under section 117 of the Act in e-Form no. MGT-14

(ii)

Notice to Registrar of any alteration of share capital under section 64 of the Act in e-Form no. SH-7

(iii)

Application for approval of Central Government for change of name under section 13 of the Act in e-Form no. INC-24

(iv)

One Person Company- Application for Conversion under section 18 of the Act in e-Form no. INC-6

(v)

Conversion of public company into private company or private company into public company under sections 14 and 18 of the Act in e-Form no. INC-27

(vi)

Intimation to Registrar of revocation/surrender of license issued under section 8 of the Act in e-Form no. INC-20

(vii)

Return of deposits under sections 73 and 76 of the Act in e-Form no. DPT-3

(viii)

Application to ROC for obtaining the status of dormant company under sub-section (1) of section 455 of the Act in e-Form no. MSC-1

(ix)

Application for seeking status of active company under sub-section (5) of section 455 of the Act in e-Form no. MSC-4

(x)

Letter of Offer under section 68 of the Act in form e-Form no. SH-8

(xi)

Declaration of Solvency under sub-section (6) section 68 of the Act in e-Form no. SH-9

(xii)

Return in respect of buy-back of Securities under sub-section 10 of section 68 of the Act in e-Form no. SH-11

(5) In case multiple applications, e-Forms or documents are filed at a time under sub-rule (4), then all the applications, e-Forms or documents shall be examined and decided by the Registrar of the Central Processing Center.

(6) Nothing in this rule shall confer any power on the Registrar of the Central Processing Center under section 399 of the Act in case of applications, e-Forms or documents filed under sub-rule (4), and the Registrar having territorial jurisdiction shall continue to exercise his powers under the said section.”.

Payment Intermediary by Card Network – Restraining of Unauthorized Payment System

It has come to the notice of Reserve Bank of India that a Card Network had an arrangement that enables businesses to make card payments through certain intermediaries, to entities that do not accept card payments.

2. Under this arrangement, the intermediary accepts card payments from corporates for their commercial payments and then remits the funds via IMPS/RTGS/NEFT to non-card accepting recipients.

3. On closer scrutiny, it was observed that this arrangement qualified as a payment system. Under the provisions of Payment and Settlement Systems (PSS) Act, 2007, such payment system requires authorization under Section 4 of PSS Act, which has not been obtained in the instant case. The activity was, therefore, without legal sanction.

4. The arrangement has also raised following concerns:

  1. The intermediary in the above arrangement pooled large amount of funds into an account which is not a designated account under PSS Act.
  2. Transactions processed under this arrangement did not comply with the originator and beneficiary information requirements, as stipulated under Master Direction on KYC issued by the Reserve Bank.

5. As per information available, only one card network has operationalized this arrangement in the country so far.

6. As the matter is under detailed examination, the Card Network has been advised to keep all such arrangements under abeyance, till further orders. It is clarified that the Reserve Bank has not placed any restriction with respect to normal usage of business credit cards.

Source