MM TAX CLUB_whatsapp

MM TAX CLUB

Accounting & Tax Consultancy Firm

Blogs

auto mobile_Production_ Linked _Incentive_ Scheme_mmtaxclub

A total of 115 companies file their applications under the Production Linked Incentive Scheme for Automobile and Auto Component Industry in India

The scheme has been a huge success in terms of applications received from local as well as globally headquarted groups

Incentive structure to encourage industry to make fresh investments in indigenous supply chain/ deep localization of Advanced Automotive Technology products

PLI Scheme for Automotive Sector along with PLI scheme for ACC and FAME  to enable India to leapfrog to environmentally cleaner, sustainable, advanced and more efficient Electric Vehicles (EV) based system

Major boost to Hon’ble Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Make in India and AtmaNirbharBharat

 

Posted On: 10 JAN 2022 5:22PM by PIB Delhi
 

A total of 115 companies have filed their application under the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme for Automobile and Auto Component Industry in India which was notified on 23rd September 2021. The scheme was open for receiving applications till 23:59:59 hours IST on 9th January 2022. Incentives are applicable under the scheme for determined sales of Advanced Automotive Technology (AAT) products (vehicles and components) manufactured in India from 1st April 2022 onwards for a period of 5 consecutive years.

The Government has approved the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme for Automobile and Auto Components Industry in India for Enhancing India’s Manufacturing Capabilities for Advanced Automotive Products with a budgetary outlay of ₹25,938 crore. The Production Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme for Automobile and Auto components proposes financial incentives to boost domestic manufacturing of Advanced Automotive Technology products and attract investments in the automotive manufacturing value chain. Its prime objectives include overcoming cost disabilities, creating economies of scale and building a robust supply chain in areas of Advanced Automotive Technology products. It will also generate employment. This scheme will facilitate the Automobile Industry to move up the value chain into higher value-added products.

Following is the category-wise distribution of applications received:

Sl. No.

Primary Category

Number of Applications

1

Champion OEM (Except 2W & 3W)

13

2

Champion OEM (2W & 3W)

7

3

New Non-Automotive Investor (OEM) Company

9

4

Component Champion

83

5

New Non-Automotive Investor (Component) Company

3

 

Total

115

 

The PLI scheme for the auto sector will incentivize high value Advanced Automotive Technology vehicles and products. It will herald a new age in higher technology, more efficient and green automotive manufacturing. The PLI Scheme for the auto sector envisages to overcome the cost disabilities to the industry for manufacturing of Advanced Automotive Technology products in India. The incentive structure will encourage industry to make fresh investments in indigenous supply chain/ deep localization of AdvancedAutomotive Technology products.

The PLI Scheme for auto sector was open to existing automotive companies as well as new investors who are currently not in automobile or auto component manufacturing business. The scheme has two components viz Champion OEM Incentive Scheme and Component Champion Incentive Scheme. The Champion OEM Incentive scheme is a ‘sales value linked’ scheme, applicable on Battery ElectricVehicles and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles of all segments. The Component Champion Incentive schemeis a ‘sales value linked’ scheme, applicable on Advanced Automotive Technology components ofvehicles, Completely Knocked Down (CKD)/ Semi Knocked Down (SKD) kits, Vehicle aggregates of 2-Wheelers, 3-Wheelers, passenger vehicles, commercial vehicles and tractors, etc.

This PLI Scheme for automotive sector (₹25,938 crore) along with the already launched PLI scheme for Advanced Chemistry Cell (ACC) (₹18,100 crore) and Faster Adaption of Manufacturing of Electric Vehicles(FAME) (₹10,000 crore) will enable India to leapfrog from traditional fossil fuel based automobile transportation system to environmentally cleaner, sustainable, advanced and more efficient Electric Vehicles (EV) based system.

The PLI scheme for Automobile and Auto Component Industry has been a huge success in terms of the applications received from local as well as globally headquartered groups engaged in/ proposing to manufacture Advanced Automotive Technology vehicles/ products.

Industry has reposed its faith in India’s stellar progress as a world class manufacturing destination which resonates strongly with Hon’ble Prime Minister’s clarion call of AtmaNirbhar Bharat - a self-reliant India.

 

 

FAKe-GST-ITC-Navi-Mumbai_

Navi Mumbai CGST Commissionerate busts Rs. 70 Crores Fake GST Input Tax Credit Racket

The officers of Navi Mumbai CGST Commissionerate of Mumbai Zone have busted a fake GST Input Tax Credit racket involving GST of Rs 70 Crores. This network, which involves more than 14 business entities had issued bogus invoices more than Rs 385 Crores without any receipt or supply of goods. The network is spread across Mumbai, Navi Mumbai, Raigad, Thane, Pune and Nagpur cities

Acting on a tip-off from Central Intelligence Unit, Mumbai CGST Zone, the officers have arrested two businessmen. One of the arrested businessman is a director of M/s Omnipotent Industries Limited which has floated a public issue recently and another one is proprietor of M/s Shree Bitumax Trading.

Both the entities are registered with GST for trading in Bitumen, Asphalt, Oil Shale and Tar Sand etc. and were indulging in fraudulent availment and passing of Input Tax Credit (ITC) of Rs 20.75 crores & Rs. 11.31 crores respectively without receiving the goods or services, in violation of the provisions of the CGST Act 2017. Both these firms were availing fake ITC from non-existing entities and passing on the same to other entities of this vicious network. Other 12 entities have availed and passed on fake ITC to the tune of Rs 38 Crores.

Both Director and proprietor were arrested under Section 69 of CGST Act 2017 for contravention of Section 132 of the Act and produced before the Hon’ble Judicial Magistrate First class, Vashi today, who has remanded them to 14 days judicial custody. Omnipotent Industries got its public listing in November 2021 and possibility of misuse of funds, generated from fake ITC network, for other financial gains is also not ruled out. Further investigation is under progress and other enforcement agencies will also be informed about their nefarious activities.

This operation is a part of special anti-tax evasion drive initiated by the CGST Mumbai Zone. In this special drive, a trained set of officers is using data analytics and network analysis tools to identify fake ITC networks and potential cases of tax evasion. During this four month old drive, more than 500 tax evasion cases have been booked leading to arrest of 40 persons, detection of tax evasion of Rs. 4550 crores and tax recovery of Rs. 600 crores.

Recently, on 03.01.2022, the officers of Thane CGST Commissionerate had arrested a father-son duo for running a fake ITC network of Rs. 22 crores. On 5.1.2022, the officers of Mumbai Central Commissionerate had arrested a timber merchant, the proprietor of M/s Noor Timber for availing fake ITC of Rs. 5.47 crores from non-existing entities.

The officers of Mumbai zone are also minutely analysing business transactions related to digital economy like online gaming, Non Fungible Tokens, e-commerce to identify the areas of possible tax evasion. Recently, a case of GST evasion by crypto currency exchange WazirX was also detected by CGST Mumbai Zone and GST of Rs. 49.2 Crores were recovered during the course of investigation. The department is going to intensify the anti-tax evasion drive against the fraudsters and tax evaders in the coming weeks.

 

 

Access press release

gold_bond_Sovereign_mmtaxclub
CBIC_ GST_GSTR1_GSTR3B

CBIC issued Guidelines for recovery proceeding initiation in case where difference in GST liability as per GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B.

Guidelines for recovery proceedings under the provisions of section 79 of the CGST Act,2017 in cases covered under explanation to sub-section (12) of section 75 of the CGST Act,2017.

  1. Sub-section (12) of section 75 of the CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") provides that notwithstanding anything contained in section 73 or section 74 of the Act, where any amount of self-assessed tax in accordance with the return furnished under section 39 remains unpaid, either wholly or partly, or any amount of interest payable on such tax remains unpaid, the same shall be recovered under the provisions of section 79. An explanation has been added to sub section (12) of section 75 vide section 114 of the Finance Act, 2021 with effect from 01.01.2022 to clarify that "self-assessed tax" shall include the tax payable in respect of outward supplies, the details of which have been furnished under section 37. but not included in the return furnished under section 39.

 

  1. Doubts are being raised by the trade and the field formations regarding modalities for initiation of the recovery proceedings under section 79 of the Act in the cases covered under the explanation to sub-section (12) of section 75 of the Act. In view of the above, the following guidelines are hereby issued with respect to the recovery proceedings under section 79 of the Act in such cases

 

  1. Sub-section (12) of section 75 of the Act is reproduced hereunder for reference: "(12) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 73 or section 74, where any amount of selfassessed tar in accordance with d return furnished under section 39 remains unpaid, either wholly or partly, or any amount of interest payable on such tax remains unpaid, the same shall be recovered under the provisions of section 79.

Explanation - For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression "self-assessed tax" shall include the tax payable in respect of details of outward supplies furnished under section 37, but not included in the return furnished under section 39. "

From the perusal of the above provision, it is clear that where the tax payable in respect of details of outward supplies furnished by the registered person in GSTR-I, has not been paid through GSTR-3B return, either wholly or partly, or any amount of interest payable on such tax remains unpaid, then in such cases, the tax short paid on such self-assessed and thus self-admitted liability, and the interest thereon, are liable to be recovered under the provisions of section 79.

 

  1. There may, however, be some cases where there may be a genuine reason for difference between the details of outward supplies declared in GSTR-1 and those declared in GSTR-3B. For example, the person may have made a typographical error or may have wrongly reported any detail in GSTR-I or GSTR-3B. Such errors or omissions can be rectified by the said person in a subsequent GSTR-I/ GSTR-3B as per the provisions of sub-section (3) of section 37 or the provisions of sub-section (9) of section 39, as the case may be. There may also be cases, where a supply could not be declared by the registered person in GSTR-1 of an earlier tax period, though the tax on the same was paid by correctly reporting the said supply in GSTR-3B. The details of such supply may now be reported by the registered person in the GSTR-1 of the current tax period. In such cases, there could be a mis-match between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B (liability reported in GSTR-I > tax paid in GSTR-3B) in the current tax period. Therefore, in all such cases, an opportunity needs to be provided to the concerned registered person to explain the differences between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, if any, and for short payment or non-payment of the amount of self-assessed tax liability, and interest thereon, before any action under section 79 of the Act is taken for recovery of the said amount.

 

  1. Accordingly, where ever any such amount of tax, self-assessed by the registered person in his outward supply statement GSTR-I is found to be short paid or not paid by the said person through his GSTR-3B return in terms of the provisions of sub-section (12) of section 75 of the Act, the proper officer may send a communication (with DIN, in terms of guidelines issued vide circular No. 12214112019-GST dated 5th November 2019) to the registered person to pay the amount short paid or not paid, or to explain the reasons for such short payment or non-payment of self-assessed tax, within a reasonable time, as prescribed in the communication. If, the concerned person is able to justify the differences between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, or is able to explain the reasons of such short-payment or non-payment of tax, to the satisfaction of the proper officer, or pays the amount such short paid or not paid, then there may not be any requirement to initiate proceedings for recovery under section 79.

 

  1. However, if the said registered person either fails to reply to the proper officer, or fails to make the payment of such amount short paid or not paid, within the time prescribed in the communication or such further period as may be permitted by the proper officer, then the proceedings for recovery of the said amount as per provisions of section 79 may be initiated by the proper officer. Further, where the said registered person fails to explain the reasons for such difference/ short payment of tax to the satisfaction of the proper officer, then the proper officer may proceed for recovery of the said amount as per provisions of section 79.

 

  1. Difficulty, if any, in implementation of the above guidelines may please be brought to the notice of the Board. Hindi version would follow.