MM TAX CLUB_whatsapp

MM TAX CLUB

Accounting & Tax Consultancy Firm

Blogs

date extension GST amnesty scheme

CBIC extended due date of amnesty scheme as proposed in 50th GST council meeting | Download Notification

In pursuance 50th GST council meeting held on 11th July 2023, CBIC notified date extensions for the many amnesty schemes under GST as proposed in the council meeting.

To notified the said proposal CBIC issued 9 notifications from Notification No. 18/2023-Central Tax to 26/2023-Central Tax dated 17th July 2023.

All that Notifications can be accessed from the below link;-

Sr. No.

Notification Dated

Notification Number

Purpose

1.

17-07-2023

18/2023-Central Tax

Seeks to extend the due date for furnishing FORM GSTR-1 for April, May and June, 2023 for registered persons whose principal place of business is in the State of Manipur

2.

17-07-2023

19/2023-Central Tax

Seeks to extend the due date for furnishing FORM GSTR-3B for April, May and June, 2023 for registered persons whose principal place of business is in the State of Manipur

3.

17-07-2023

20/2023-Central Tax

Seeks to extend the due date for furnishing FORM GSTR-3B for quarter ending June, 2023 for registered persons whose principal place of business is in the State of Manipur

4.

17-07-2023

21/2023-Central Tax

Seeks to extend the due date for furnishing FORM GSTR-7 for April, May and June, 2023 for registered persons whose principal place of business is in the State of Manipur

5.

17-07-2023

22/2023-Central Tax

Seeks to extend amnesty for GSTR-4 non-filers

6.

17-07-2023

23/2023-Central Tax

Seeks to extend time limit for application for revocation of cancellation of registration

7.

17-07-2023

24/2023-Central Tax

Seeks to extend amnesty scheme for deemed withdrawal of assessment orders issued under Section 62

8.

17-07-2023

25/2023-Central Tax

Seeks to extend amnesty for GSTR-9 non-filers

9.

17-Jul-2023

26/2023-Central Tax

Seeks to extend amnesty for GSTR-10 non-filers

clarification on einvoice

CBIC issued Clarification on issue pertaining to e-invoice

In pursuance of 50th GST council meeting, CBIC issued Circular No.  198/10/2023-GST Dated the 17th July, 2023 for Clarification on issue pertaining to e-invoice

                Resentations have been received seeking clarification with respect to applicability of e-invoice under rule 48(4) of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Rules”) w.r.t supplies made by a registered person, whose turnover exceeds the prescribed threshold for generation of e-invoicing, to Government Departments or establishments/ Government agencies/ local authorities/ PSUs registered solely for the purpose of deduction of tax at source as per provisions of section 51 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Act”).

2.     In order to clarify the issue and to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of law across the field formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers conferred by section 168 (1) of the CGST Act, hereby clarifies the issue as under:

Sr. No.

Issue

Clarification

1

Whether   e-invoicing   is applicable for supplies made by a  registered  person,  whose turnover exceeds the prescribed threshold  for  generation  of  e-invoicing,   to   Government Departments or establishments/ Government  agencies/  local authorities/  PSUs  which  are registered solely for the purpose of deduction of tax at source as per provisions of section 51 of the CGST Act?

Government  Departments  or  establishments/ Government agencies/ local authorities/ PSUs, which are required to deduct tax at source as per provisions of section 51 of the CGST/SGST Act, are  liable  for  compulsory  registration  in accordance with section 24(vi) of the CGST Act. Therefore,   Government   Departments   or establishments/  Government  agencies/  local authorities/  PSUs,  registered  solely  for  the purpose of  deduction  of  tax  at  source as  per provisions of section 51 of the CGST Act, are to be treated as registered persons under the GST law as per provisions of clause (94) of section 2 of  CGST  Act.  Accordingly,  the  registered person, whose turnover exceeds the prescribed threshold  for  generation  of  e-invoicing,  is required  to  issue  e-invoices  for  the  supplies made  to  such  Government  Departments  or establishments/  Government  agencies/  local authorities/ PSUs, etc under rule 48(4) of CGST Rules.

3.    It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the contents of this Circular

4.    Difficulty, if any, in implementation of this Circular may please be brought to the notice of the Board.

Circular

shares held in subsidiary company

CBIC clarification on taxability of shares held in a subsidiary company by the holding company

CBIC vide Circular No.  196/08/2023-GST Dated the 17th July, 2023 issued clarification on taxability of shares held in a subsidiary company by the holding company

Representations  have  been  received  from  the  trade  and  field  formations  seeking clarification on  certain issues whether the holding of shares in a subsidiary company by the holding company will be treated as ‘supply of service’ under GST and will be taxed accordingly or whether such transaction is not a supply.

In order to clarify the issue and to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of law across the field formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers conferred by section 168 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Act”), hereby clarifies the issues as under:

S.No.

Issue

Clarification

Taxability of share capital held in subsidiary company by the parent company

1.

Whether  the  activity  of holding  shares  by  a  holding company  of  the  subsidiary company will be treated as a supply of service or not and whether the same will attract GST or not.

Securities are considered neither goods nor services in  terms  of  definition  of  goods  under clause (52)  of section 2 of CGST Act and the definition of services under clause (102) of the said section. Further, securities include  ‘shares’  as  per  definition  of  securities  under clause  (h)  of  section  2  of  Securities  Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956.

This implies that the securities held by the holding company in the subsidiary company are neither goods nor  services.  Further,  purchase  or  sale  of  shares  or securities, in itself is neither a supply of goods nor a supply  of  services.  For  a  transaction/activity  to  be treated as supply of services, there must be a supply as defined under section 7 of CGST Act. It cannot be said that a service is being provided by the holding company to the subsidiary company, solely on the basis that there is a SAC entry ‘997171’ in the scheme of classification of  services  mentioning;  “theservices   provided   by holding  companies,  i.e.  holding  securities  of  (or  other equity  interests  in)  companies  and  enterprises  for  the purpose of owning a controlling interest.”, unless there is a supply of services by the holding company to the subsidiary  company  in  accordance  with  section  7  of CGST Act.

Therefore,  the  activity  of  holding  of  shares  of subsidiary  company  by  the  holding  company  per  se cannot be treated as a supply of services by a holding company to the said subsidiary company and cannot be taxed under GST.

3.    It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the contents of this Circular.

4.    Difficulty, if any, in implementation of this Circular may please be brought to the notice of the Board

Circular

GST on spare parts under warranty

CBIC Clarification on availability of ITC in respect of warranty replacement of parts and repair services during warranty period

CBIC vide Circular No. 195/07/2023-GST  Dated the 17th July, 2023 issued clarification on availability of ITC in respect of warranty replacement of parts and repair services during warranty period

Representations have been received from trade and industry that as a common trade practice, the original equipment manufacturers /suppliers offer warranty for the goods / services supplied by them. During the warranty period, replacement goods /services are supplied to customers free of charge and as such no separate consideration is charged and received at the time of replacement. It has been represented that suitable clarification may be issued in the matter as unnecessary litigation is being caused due to contrary interpretations by the investigation wings and field formations in respect of GST liability as well as liability to reverse ITC against such supplies of replacement of parts and repair services during the warranty period without any consideration from the customers.

2. The matter has been examined. In order to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of the law across the field formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers conferred under section 168(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the CGST Act), hereby clarifies as follows:

S. No.

Issue

Clarification

1.

There are cases where the original equipment manufacturer offers warranty for the goods supplied by him to the customer and provides replacement of parts and/ or repair services to the customer during the warranty period, without separately charging any consideration at the time of such replacement/ repair services. Whether GST would be payable on such replacement of parts or supply of repair services, without any consideration from the customer, as part of warranty?

The value of original supply of goods (provided along with warranty) by the manufacturer to the customer includes the likely cost of replacement of parts and / or repair services to be incurred during the warranty period, on which tax would have already been paid at the time of original supply of goods.

As such, where the manufacturer provides replacement of parts and/ or repair services to the customer during the warranty period, without separately charging any consideration at the time of such replacement/ repair services, no further GST is chargeable on such replacement of parts and/ or repair service during warranty period. However, if any additional consideration is charged by the manufacturer from the customer, either for replacement of any part or for any service, then GST will be payable on such supply with respect to such additional consideration.

 

2.

Whether in such cases, the manufacturer is required to reverse the input tax credit in respect of such replacement of parts or supply of repair services as part of warranty, in respect of which no additional consideration is charged from the customer?

In such cases, the value of original supply of goods (provided along with warranty) by the manufacturer to the customer includes the likely cost of replacement of parts and/ or repair services to be incurred during the warranty period. Therefore, these supplies cannot be considered as exempt supply and accordingly, the manufacturer, who provides replacement of parts and/ or repair services to the customer during the warranty period, is not required to reverse the input tax credit in respect of the said replacement parts or on the repair services provided.

3.

Whether GST would be payable on replacement of parts and/ or repair services provided by a distributor without any consideration from the customer, as part of warranty on behalf of the manufacturer?

There may be instances where a distributor of a company provides replacement of parts and/ or repair services to the customer as part of warranty on behalf of the manufacturer and no separate consideration is charged by such distributor in respect of the said replacement and/ or repair services from the customer.

 In such cases, as no consideration is being charged by the distributor from the customer, no GST would be payable by the distributor on the said activity of providing replacement of parts and/ or repair services to the customer.

However, if any additional consideration is charged by the distributor from the customer, either for replacement of any part or for any service, then GST will be payable on such supply with respect to such additional consideration.

4.

In the above scenario where the distributor provides replacement of parts to the customer as part of warranty on behalf of the manufacturer, whether any supply is involved between the distributor and the manufacturer and whether the distributor would be required to reverse the input tax credit in respect of such replacement of parts?

  1. There may be cases where the distributor replaces the part(s) to the customer under warranty either by using his stock or by purchasing from a third party and charges the consideration for the part(s) so replaced from the manufacturer, by issuance of a tax invoice, for the said supply made by him to the manufacturer. In such a case, GST would be payable by the distributor on the said supply by him to the manufacturer and the manufacturer would be entitled to avail the input tax credit of the same, subject to other conditions of CGST Act. In such case, no reversal of input tax credit by the distributor is required in respect of the same.
  2. There may be cases where the distributor raises a requisition to the manufacturer for the part(s) to be replaced by him under warranty and the manufacturer then provides the said part(s) to the distributor for the purpose of such replacement to the customer as part of warranty.

In such a case, where the manufacturer is providing such part(s) to the distributor for replacement to the customer during the warranty period, without separately charging any consideration at the time of such replacement, no GST is payable on such replacement of parts by the manufacturer. Further, no reversal of ITC is required to be made by the manufacturer in respect of the parts so replaced by the distributor under warranty.

(c) There may be cases where the distributor replaces the part(s) to the customer under warranty out of the supply already received by him from the manufacturer and the manufacturer issues a credit note in respect of the parts so replaced subject to provisions of sub-section (2) of section 34 of the CGST Act. Accordingly, the tax liability may be adjusted by the manufacturer, subject to the condition that the said distributor has reversed the ITC availed against the parts so replaced.

5.

Where the distributor provides repair service, in addition to replacement of parts or otherwise, to the customer without any consideration, as part of warranty, on behalf of the manufacturer but charges the manufacturer for such repair services either by way of issue of tax invoice or a debit note, whether GST would be payable on such activity by the distributor?

In such scenario, there is a supply of service by the distributor and the manufacturer is the recipient of such supply of repair services in accordance with the provisions of sub-clause (a) of clause (93) to section 2 of the CGST Act, 2017.

Hence, GST would be payable on such provision of service by the distributor to the manufacturer and the manufacturer would be entitled to avail the input tax credit of the same, subject to other conditions of CGST Act.

6.

Sometimes companies provide offers of Extended warranty to the customers which can be availed at the time of original supply or just before the expiry of the standard warranty period. Whether GST would be payable in both the cases?

  1. If a customer enters in to an agreement of extended warranty with the manufacturer at the time of original supply, then the consideration for such extended warranty becomes part of the value of the composite supply, the principal supply being the supply of goods, and GST would be payable accordingly.
  2. However, in case where a consumer enters into an agreement of extended warranty at any time after the original supply, then the same is a separate contract and GST would be payable by the service provider, whether manufacturer or the distributor or any third party, depending on the nature of the contract (i.e. whether the extended warranty is only for goods or for services or for composite supply involving goods and services)

3. It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the contents of this Circular.

4. Difficulty, if any, in implementation of this Circular may please be brought to the notice of the Board.

Circular

TCS under GST

CBIC Clarification on TCS liability under Sec 52 of the CGST Act, 2017 in case of multiple E-commerce Operators in one transaction

CBIC vide Circular No. 194/06/2023-GST Dated the 17th July, 2023 issued Clarification on TCS liability under Sec 52 of the CGST Act, 2017 in case of multiple E-commerce Operators in one transaction.

            Reference has been received seeking clarification regarding TCS liability under section 52 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Act”),  in case of multiple E-commerce Operators (ECOs) in one transaction, in the context of Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC).

2.1   In the current platform-centric model of e-commerce, the buyer interface and seller interface are operated by the same ECO. This ECO collects the consideration from the buyer, deducts the TCS under Sec 52 of the CGST Act, credits the deducted TCS amount to the GST cash ledger of the seller and passes on the balance of the consideration to the seller after deducting their service charges.

2.2   In the case of the ONDC Network or similar other arrangements, there can be multiple ECOs in a single transaction - one providing an interface to the buyer and the other providing an interface to the seller. In this setup, buyer-side ECO could collect consideration, deduct their commission and pass on the consideration to the seller-side ECO. In this context, clarity has been sought as to which ECO should deduct TCS and make other compliances under section 52 of CGST Act in such situations, as in such models having multiple ECOs in a single transaction, both the Buyer-side ECO and the Seller-side ECO qualify as ECOs as per Section 2(45) of the CGST Act.

3.    In  order  to  clarify  the  issue  and  to  ensure  uniformity  in  the  implementation  of  the provisions of law across the field formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers conferred by section  168 (1)  of  the CGST Act, hereby clarifies the issues as under:

Issue 1:In a situation where multiple ECOs are involved in a single transaction of supply of goods or services or both through ECO platform and where the supplier-side ECO himself is not the supplier in the said supply, who is liable for compliances under section 52 including collection of TCS?

 

Buyer > Buyer-side ECO > Supplier-side ECO > Supplier

Clarification: In such a situation where multiple ECOs are involved in a single transaction of supply of goods or services or both through ECO platform and where the supplier-side ECO himself is not the supplier of the said goods or services, the compliances under section 52 of CGST Act, including collection of TCS, is to be done by the supplier-side ECO who finally releases the payment to the supplier for a particular supply made by the said supplier through him.

e.g.: Buyer-side ECO collects payment from the buyer, deducts its fees/commissions and remits the balance to Seller-side ECO. Here, the Seller-side ECO will release the payment to the supplier after deduction of his fees/commissions and therefore will also be required to collect TCS, as applicable and pay the same to the Government in accordance with section 52 of CGST Act and also make other compliances under section 52 of CGST Act.

In this case, the Buyer-side ECO will neither be required to collect TCS nor will be required to make other compliances in accordance with section 52 of CGST Act with respect to this particular supply.

Issue 2: In a situation where multiple ECOs are involved in a single transaction of supply of goods or services or both through ECO platform and the Supplier-side ECO is himself the supplier of the said supply, who is liable for compliances under section 52 including collection of TCS?

 

Buyer > Buyer-side ECO > Supplier (also an ECO)

 

Clarification: In such a situation, TCS is to be collected by the Buyer-side ECO while making payment to the supplier for the particular supply being made through it.

e.g. Buyer-side ECO collects payment from the buyer, deducts its fees and remits the balance to the supplier (who is itself an ECO as per the definition in Sec 2(45) of the CGST Act). In this scenario, the Buyer-side ECO will also be required to collect TCS, as applicable, pay the same to the Government in accordance with section 52 of CGST Act and also make other compliances under section 52 of CGST Act.

4.    It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the contents of this Circular.

5.    Difficulty, if any, in implementation of this Circular may please be brought to the notice of the Board.

Circular